Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $320 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 65/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 6500); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 1,059,715).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Pro better?
- Cheaper at launch: $320 vs $548
- Better camera (64/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 1059715
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 59/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 92/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 10 points higher (75/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads (64/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Pro — 66/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (95/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (64/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (64/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 1059715 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $320 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 50 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 50 Pro by 70.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $228. Tecno Camon 50 Pro was $228 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (95/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (64/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (80/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (64/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 50 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads on camera score (64/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.