Sharp Aquos R8s Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 58/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 47 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,757,044); the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro is noticeably lighter (203g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Sharp Aquos R8s Pro better?
- Lighter: 203g vs 226g
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 47MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 30 points higher (88/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R8s Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1757044 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" LTPO IGZO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2730 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 47 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×77.0×9.3 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
- Main: 47MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
- 6.6" LTPO IGZO OLED
- Resolution: 1260x2730
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Sharp Aquos R8s Pro by 47.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (94/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (96/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (81/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro by 30 points (88/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R8s Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R8s Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.