Sharp Aquos R9 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Sharp Aquos R9 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $599 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 68/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,660,924); the Sharp Aquos R9 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R9
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $899
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1660924
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1860
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5045
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R9 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 20 points higher (88/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Sharp Aquos R9 — 50/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R9 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1660924 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1860 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5045 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 156.0×75.0×8.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R9
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R9
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R9
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R9 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Sharp Aquos R9 by 50.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $300. Sharp Aquos R9 was $300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (94/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (96/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (81/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R9 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 by 20 points (88/100 vs 68/100).
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R9 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R9 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R9 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R9 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R9 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R9 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.