Sharp Aquos R11 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Sharp Aquos R11 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 74/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,258,010 vs 2,309,488); the Sharp Aquos R11 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 226g).
Sharp Aquos R11
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 226g
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3258010 vs 2309488
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2070
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 6694
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 36W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 49/100)
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R11 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 13 points higher (87/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (81/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R11 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2309488 | 3258010 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2070 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6694 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 36W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 38 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 156.0×74.0×8.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Sharp Aquos R11
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 38MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Sharp Aquos R11
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Sharp Aquos R11
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Sharp Aquos R11 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Sharp Aquos R11 by 29.1% in our overall performance rating.
Sharp Aquos R11
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (96/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (81/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R11 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R11 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 76/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R11 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R11 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.