Sharp Aquos R11 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Sharp Aquos R11 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 74/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5100); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 2,314,417); the Sharp Aquos R11 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R11
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Sharp Aquos R11 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 165Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 223g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 2314417
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2072
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 6649
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 36W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 90/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R11 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 15 points higher (89/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (100/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Sharp Aquos R11 are nearly equal (78/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (90/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R11 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 2314417 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2072 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6649 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 36W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 38 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.0×74.0×8.9 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R11
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 38MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R11
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R11
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R11 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Sharp Aquos R11 by 57.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R11
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (100/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Sharp Aquos R11 are nearly equal (78/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (90/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R11 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Sharp Aquos R11 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R11 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Sharp Aquos R11 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.