Sharp Aquos R11 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Sharp Aquos R11 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 74/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,314,417); the Sharp Aquos R11 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R11
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Sharp Aquos R11 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2314417
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2072
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6649
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 36W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R11 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 17 points higher (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R11 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2314417 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2072 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6649 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 36W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 38 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.0×74.0×8.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R11
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 38MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R11
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R11
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R11 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R11 by 45.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R11
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (99/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (96/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (85/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R11 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R11 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 76/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R11 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R11 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.