Sharp Aquos R11 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Sharp Aquos R11 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 74/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,309,488); the Sharp Aquos R11 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Sharp Aquos R11
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2309488
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2070
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6694
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 36W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R11 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 17 points higher (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R11 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2309488 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2070 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6694 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 36W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 38 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.0×74.0×8.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Sharp Aquos R11
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 38MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Sharp Aquos R11
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Sharp Aquos R11
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Sharp Aquos R11 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R11 by 45.6% in our overall performance rating.
Sharp Aquos R11
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (99/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (96/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (85/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R11 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R11 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 76/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R11 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R11 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.