Sharp Aquos R9 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 76/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,797,821); the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.3mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 229g vs 230g
- Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 27/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 15 points higher (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 27/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R9 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.0×78.0×9.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1440x3120
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R9 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R9 Pro by 57.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (96/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (85/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 27/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.