Sharp Aquos R8s Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 58/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 47 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,757,044); the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro is noticeably lighter (203g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Sharp Aquos R8s Pro better?
- Lighter: 203g vs 230g
- Better portability (43/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 47MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 33 points higher (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R8s Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1757044 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" LTPO IGZO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2730 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 47 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×77.0×9.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
- Main: 47MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
- 6.6" LTPO IGZO OLED
- Resolution: 1260x2730
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R8s Pro by 58.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (99/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (96/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (85/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro by 33 points (91/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R8s Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R8s Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.