Sharp Aquos R8s Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 58/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 47 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,757,044); the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro is noticeably lighter (203g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Sharp Aquos R8s Pro better?
- Lighter: 203g vs 223g
- Better portability (43/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 47MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 31 points higher (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (100/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (78/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (90/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R8s Pro | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1757044 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.6" LTPO IGZO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2730 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 47 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×77.0×9.3 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
- Main: 47MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
- 6.6" LTPO IGZO OLED
- Resolution: 1260x2730
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Sharp Aquos R8s Pro by 68.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R8s Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (100/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (78/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro (90/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro by 31 points (89/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Sharp Aquos R8s Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R8s Pro over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Sharp Aquos R8s Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.