Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Tecno Pova Curve
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate; launch prices were $2899 and $219. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 58/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tecno Pova Curve
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 11 points higher (69/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 42/100, Tecno Pova Curve — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2813 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $219 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Pova Curve
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Pova Curve
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Tecno Pova Curve, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Tecno Pova Curve by 233.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $2680. Tecno Pova Curve was $2680 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (91/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova Curve — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.