Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Tecno Phantom X2
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Phantom X2 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 62/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,504,467); the Tecno Phantom X2 is noticeably lighter (203g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tecno Phantom X2
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1504467
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1693
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4384
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5160 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 51/100)
What makes Tecno Phantom X2 better?
- Lighter: 203g vs 309g
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Tecno Phantom X2, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 7 points higher (69/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom X2 (90/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Phantom X2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Phantom X2 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom X2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Tecno Phantom X2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1504467 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1693 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 4384 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5160 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 12, HIOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 164.6×72.7×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Phantom X2
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom X2
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Phantom X2
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Tecno Phantom X2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Tecno Phantom X2 by 94.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Phantom X2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom X2 (90/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Phantom X2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Phantom X2 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom X2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Phantom X2?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Tecno Phantom X2 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Phantom X2?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Tecno Phantom X2 — 62/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Phantom X2?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Tecno Phantom X2?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Phantom X2 is a better fit for active users.