Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Tecno Phantom V Fold
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Phantom V Fold (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 64/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,540,240); the Tecno Phantom V Fold is thinner (6.9mm vs 12.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tecno Phantom V Fold
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1540240
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1967
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5401
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Tecno Phantom V Fold better?
- Lighter: 299g vs 309g
- Better camera (58/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (47/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Tecno Phantom V Fold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 5 points higher (69/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (63/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Tecno Phantom V Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1540240 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1967 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 5401 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2000x2296 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 13, HiOS 13 Fold | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 309 g | 299 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Tecno Phantom V Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Tecno Phantom V Fold by 90.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Phantom V Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (90/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (63/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Tecno Phantom V Fold by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Tecno Phantom V Fold — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold leads on camera score (58/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Phantom V Fold is a better fit for active users.