Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Tecno Phantom V Fold
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Phantom V Fold (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 44/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,453,683); the Tecno Phantom V Fold is thinner (6.9mm vs 12.9mm).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1453683
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1967
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 5401
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 25/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 42/100)
- Lighter: 299g vs 309g
- Better camera (53/100 vs 49/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Tecno Phantom V Fold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 13 points higher (57/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 25/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (67/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Tecno Phantom V Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1453683 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 1967 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 5401 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2000x2296 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 13, HiOS 13 Fold | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 309 g | 299 g | |
| Price | $2899 | — |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Tecno Phantom V Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Tecno Phantom V Fold by 101.3% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Phantom V Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (67/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Tecno Phantom V Fold — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Tecno Phantom V Fold — 44/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Phantom V Fold is a better fit for everyday use.