Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Phantom V Fold (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 44/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 1,453,683); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably lighter (214g vs 299g).
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 1453683
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1967
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 5401
- Faster charging: 60W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 214g vs 299g
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 53/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 42/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (32/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Tecno Phantom V Fold, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 31 points higher (75/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 53/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold leads (55/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (84/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (86/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (32/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (55/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Phantom V Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | |
| AnTuTu | 3515964 | 1453683 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 1967 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 5401 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 2000x2296 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 13, HiOS 13 Fold | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 214 g | 299 g | |
| Price | $1299 | — |
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Tecno Phantom V Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Tecno Phantom V Fold by 141.9% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Phantom V Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (84/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (86/100 vs 53/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (32/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (55/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold by 31 points (75/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Tecno Phantom V Fold — 44/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 53/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (84/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Phantom V Fold is a better fit for everyday use.