Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Phantom V Fold (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 79/100 vs 64/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,780,751 vs 1,540,240); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably lighter (218g vs 299g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Tecno Phantom V Fold
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2780751 vs 1540240
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1967
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 5401
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 218g vs 299g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Tecno Phantom V Fold better?
- Better portability (47/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Tecno Phantom V Fold, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 15 points higher (79/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Phantom V Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | |
| AnTuTu | 2780751 | 1540240 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 1967 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9760 | 5401 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 2000x2296 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 151 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 13, HiOS 13 Fold | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 218 g | 299 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Tecno Phantom V Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Tecno Phantom V Fold by 80.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Phantom V Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (91/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold (81/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Phantom V Fold — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Tecno Phantom V Fold — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Tecno Phantom V Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Phantom V Fold is a better fit for active users.