Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 79/100 vs 65/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,800,202 vs 1,203,771); the Tecno Camon 30 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 218g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 30 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Performance 91
Display 88
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 46
Value for money 66
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Performance 64
Display 89
Camera 60
Battery 53
Portability 70
Value for money
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2800202 vs 1203771
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1256
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 4207
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 53/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 30 Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 188g vs 218g

  • Better display (89/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Tecno Camon 30 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 14 points higher (79/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 30 Pro are nearly equal (56/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (70/100 vs 46/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Tecno Camon 30 Pro: The Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate
AnTuTu 2800202 1203771
Geekbench Single 3100 1256
Geekbench Multi 9760 4207
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1080x2436
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 45W 70W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 151
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / One UI 7 Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm 164.0×74.5×7.7 mm
Weight 218 g 188 g
Launch price $1299
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Tecno Camon 30 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
79/100
2800202 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 30 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate
65/100 -132.6%
1203771 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 30 Pro by 132.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
$1299
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (91/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (81/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 30 Pro are nearly equal (56/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (70/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 30 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a better fit for active users.