Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 79/100 vs 65/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,780,751 vs 1,504,467); the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro is noticeably lighter (201g vs 218g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 88
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 46
Value for money 68

Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

Performance 71
Display 79
Camera 63
Battery 51
Portability 47
Value for money —

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2780751 vs 1504467
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1693
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 4384
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 63/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 79/100)

What makes Tecno Phantom X2 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 201g vs 218g

  • Better portability (47/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 14 points higher (79/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro: The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9000
AnTuTu 2780751 1504467
Geekbench Single 3100 1693
Geekbench Multi 9760 4384
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5160 mAh
Charging 45W 45W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 151 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 13 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB
OS Android 15 / One UI 7 Android 12, HIOS 12
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm 164.6×72.7×9.0 mm
Weight 218 g 201 g
Launch price $1299 —

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera

Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
63
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Tecno Phantom X2 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
79/100
2780751 AnTuTu
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9000
65/100 -84.8%
1504467 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Tecno Phantom X2 Pro by 84.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

$1299

Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro (91/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro (81/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro is a better fit for active users.