Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 65/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 1,203,771); the Tecno Camon 30 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 214g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 30 Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 76
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Performance 64
Display 89
Camera 60
Battery 53
Portability 70
Value for money
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 1203771
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1256
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 4207
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 53/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 30 Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 60W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 188g vs 214g

  • Better display (89/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Tecno Camon 30 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 19 points higher (84/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (86/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (70/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Tecno Camon 30 Pro: The Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate
AnTuTu 3515964 1203771
Geekbench Single 3601 1256
Geekbench Multi 10686 4207
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1080x2436
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 60W 70W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm 164.0×74.5×7.7 mm
Weight 214 g 188 g
Price $1299
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Tecno Camon 30 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100
3515964 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 30 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate
65/100 -192.1%
1203771 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 30 Pro by 192.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
$1299
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (96/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (86/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (70/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 30 Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Tecno Camon 30 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a better fit for active users.