Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 73/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 has the bigger battery (5750 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 1,453,683); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably lighter (214g vs 249g).
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 1453683
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1967
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 5401
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Lighter: 214g vs 249g
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 73/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 78/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 79/100)
- Bigger battery: 5750 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 60W
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 61/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Tecno Phantom V Fold2, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 11 points higher (84/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (96/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | |
| AnTuTu | 3515964 | 1453683 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 1967 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 5401 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 2000x2296 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5750 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HiOS 14 Fold | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | 159.0×140.4×6.1 mm | |
| Weight | 214 g | 249 g | |
| Price | $1299 | — |
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 5750 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Tecno Phantom V Fold2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Tecno Phantom V Fold2 by 141.9% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (96/100 vs 73/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 73/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a better fit for active users.