Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate; launch prices were $2899 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 65/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,673,316); the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably lighter (209g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1673316
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4313
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 209g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (44/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 4 points higher (69/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (90/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (44/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1673316 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1398 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 4313 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 / HIOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 209 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $300 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- Main: 108MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Tecno Pova 7 Ultra by 74.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2599. Tecno Pova 7 Ultra was $2599 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (90/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (44/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.