Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate; launch prices were $999 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads — 70/100 vs 65/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4900); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 1,673,316); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is noticeably lighter (190g vs 209g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ edges out the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 40
Battery 54
Portability 72
Value for money 50

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

Performance 69
Display 94
Camera 43
Battery 72
Portability 44
Value for money 68

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 1673316
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9200 vs 4313
  • Lighter: 190g vs 209g

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better portability (72/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $999

  • Better camera (43/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ scores 5 points higher (70/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 50/100, Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (72/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (72/100 vs 44/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26+: The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra: The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S26+ Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Processor Samsung Exynos 2600 Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
AnTuTu 3161126 1673316
Geekbench Single 2900 1398
Geekbench Multi 9200 4313
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4900 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 45W 70W
Wireless charging 15W 30W
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 15 / HIOS 15
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP64
Dimensions 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm
Weight 190 g 209 g
Launch price $999 $300

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • Main: 108MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
43
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • 4900 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
54
battery

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • Wireless: 30W
72
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26+ and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600
70/100
3161126 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
65/100 -88.9%
1673316 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Tecno Pova 7 Ultra by 88.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S26+

$999

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

$300

Launch price difference: $699. Tecno Pova 7 Ultra was $699 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (91/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (72/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (72/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ edges out the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 65/100.

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on performance (91/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26+ over the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.