Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350; launch prices were $999 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads — 73/100 vs 70/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 4900); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 1,724,757).

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26+ by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 40
Battery 54
Portability 72
Value for money 50

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

Performance 70
Display 94
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 66
Value for money 70

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 1724757
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9200 vs 4313
  • Lighter: 190g vs 193g

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better portability (72/100 vs 66/100)

What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?

  • Bigger battery: 5100 vs 4900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $999

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs the Tecno Camon 40 Premier, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier scores 3 points higher (73/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (81/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 50/100, Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (81/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (72/100 vs 66/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26+: The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Tecno Camon 40 Premier: The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S26+ Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Processor Samsung Exynos 2600 MediaTek Dimensity 8350
AnTuTu 3161126 1724757
Geekbench Single 2900 1398
Geekbench Multi 9200 4313
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4900 mAh 5100 mAh
Charging 45W 70W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm
Weight 190 g 193 g
Launch price $999 $450

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • 4900 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
54
battery

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26+ and Tecno Camon 40 Premier, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600
70/100
3161126 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 40 Premier MediaTek Dimensity 8350
73/100 -83.3%
1724757 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 83.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S26+

$999

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

$450

Launch price difference: $549. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $549 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (91/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (81/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (72/100 vs 66/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26+ by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (81/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on performance (91/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26+ over the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.