Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate; launch prices were $799 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 74/100 vs 65/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (2,827,538 vs 1,673,316); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 209g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2827538 vs 1673316
- Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 4313
- Lighter: 162g vs 209g
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (77/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (89/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $799
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 9 points higher (74/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (89/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (77/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 — 62/100, Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (89/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (77/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (72/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (89/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 2827538 | 1673316 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2880 | 1398 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9100 | 4313 | |
| Display | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 30W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 146 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 15 / HIOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 162 g | 209 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $300 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- Main: 108MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 leads Tecno Pova 7 Ultra by 69.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $499. Tecno Pova 7 Ultra was $499 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (89/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (77/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (72/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (89/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 edges out the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on camera score (77/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (89/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.