Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Xiaomi 17
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $2899 and $709. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 leads — 87/100 vs 69/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 is faster in AnTuTu (3,274,157 vs 2,926,532); the Xiaomi 17 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Xiaomi 17
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3274157 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3566 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10162 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 191g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $709 vs $2899
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Xiaomi 17, the Xiaomi 17 scores 18 points higher (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 leads (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 leads (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17 leads (86/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (63/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (86/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 3274157 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3566 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 10162 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2656x1200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 / HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 151.1×71.8×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 191 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $709 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Xiaomi 17
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2656x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Xiaomi 17
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 15:00 hrs, total 33:58 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Xiaomi 17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 10.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2190. Xiaomi 17 is cheaper by $2190.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (63/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (86/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 17?
The Xiaomi 17 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Xiaomi 17?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Xiaomi 17 — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 17?
The Xiaomi 17 leads on camera score (81/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Xiaomi 17?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.