Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs Tecno Pova Curve
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 71/100 vs 58/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 877,641); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.9mm vs 7.5mm).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Tecno Pova Curve
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2813
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 70/100)
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 199g
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 13 points higher (71/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve leads (64/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (64/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2813 | |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1828x2584 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | $219 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Pova Curve
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova Curve
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and Tecno Pova Curve, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Tecno Pova Curve by 255.4% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (92/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (64/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova Curve — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.