Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Tecno Pova Curve
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate; launch prices were $1799 and $219. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads — 61/100 vs 58/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 64 MP; the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is faster in AnTuTu (1,553,009 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 258g).
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Tecno Pova Curve
- Higher AnTuTu: 1553009 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 2276 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6173 vs 2813
- Higher performance (76/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5015 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 258g
- Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $1799
- Better camera (39/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold scores 3 points higher (61/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads (76/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve leads (64/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — 26/100, Tecno Pova Curve — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (76/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (70/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G5 | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 1553009 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2276 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6173 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2152x2076 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5015 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 258 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $219 |
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Pova Curve
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2152x2076
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 5015 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Pova Curve
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Tecno Pova Curve, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads Tecno Pova Curve by 77.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1580. Tecno Pova Curve was $1580 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (76/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (70/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold edges out the Tecno Pova Curve by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 58/100.
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads on performance (76/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.