Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate; launch prices were $1799 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads — 65/100 vs 61/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 108 MP; the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,673,316 vs 1,553,009); the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably lighter (209g vs 258g).

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra edges out the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

Performance 76
Display 78
Camera 37
Battery 53
Portability 52
Value for money 30

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

Performance 69
Display 94
Camera 43
Battery 72
Portability 44
Value for money 68

What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 2276 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6173 vs 4313

  • Higher performance (76/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1673316 vs 1553009
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5015 mAh
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 209g vs 258g
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $1799

  • Better camera (43/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra scores 4 points higher (65/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — 30/100, Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (76/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (72/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra: The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G5 Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
AnTuTu 1553009 1673316
Geekbench Single 2276 1398
Geekbench Multi 6173 4313
Display 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2152x2076 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5015 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 30W 70W
Wireless charging 15W 30W
Main camera 48 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15 / HIOS 15
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP64
Dimensions 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm
Weight 258 g 209 g
Launch price $1799 $300

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
37
camera

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • Main: 108MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
43
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2152x2076
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

  • 5015 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
53
battery

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • Wireless: 30W
72
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Google Tensor G5
61/100
1553009 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
65/100 +7.2%
1673316 AnTuTu

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 7.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

$1799

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

$300

Launch price difference: $1499. Tecno Pova 7 Ultra was $1499 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (76/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (72/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra edges out the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads on camera score (43/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads on performance (76/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.