Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate; launch prices were $1199 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads — 76/100 vs 65/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,673,316 vs 1,617,706); the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably lighter (209g vs 232g).

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

Performance 77
Display 86
Camera 90
Battery 62
Portability 35
Value for money 62

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

Performance 69
Display 94
Camera 43
Battery 72
Portability 44
Value for money 68

What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro XL better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 2296 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6203 vs 4313

  • Higher performance (77/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1673316 vs 1617706
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 39W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 209g vs 232g
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $1199

  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 86/100)
  • Better portability (44/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL scores 11 points higher (76/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 62/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10 Pro XL — 62/100, Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (77/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 35/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra: The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G5 Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
AnTuTu 1617706 1673316
Geekbench Single 2296 1398
Geekbench Multi 6203 4313
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 39W 70W
Wireless charging 25W 30W
DXOMark (camera) 163 —
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 42 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15 / HIOS 15
Brightness (peak) 3300 nits 4500 nits
NFC — yes
Protection IP68 IP64
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm
Weight 232 g 209 g
Launch price $1199 $300

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
90
camera

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • Main: 108MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
43
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
86
display

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 39W
  • Wireless: 25W
62
battery

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • Wireless: 30W
72
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Google Tensor G5
76/100
1617706 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
65/100 +3.3%
1673316 AnTuTu

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads Google Pixel 10 Pro XL by 3.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

$1199

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

$300

Launch price difference: $899. Tecno Pova 7 Ultra was $899 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (77/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 86/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (90/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 62/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads on camera score (90/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads on performance (77/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL over the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.