Google Pixel 10 Pro vs Tecno Pova Curve

The Google Pixel 10 Pro (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate; launch prices were $999 and $219. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro leads — 73/100 vs 58/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 4870); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Google Pixel 10 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,467,600 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 207g).

The Google Pixel 10 Pro is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova Curve — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Performance 76
Display 88
Camera 80
Battery 50
Portability 49
Value for money 58
Tecno Pova Curve
Performance 55
Display 89
Camera 39
Battery 64
Portability 70
Value for money 76
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1467600 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2285 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6191 vs 2813

  • Higher performance (76/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (80/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Tecno Pova Curve better?
  • Bigger battery: 5500 vs 4870 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 29W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 207g
  • Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $999

  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the Google Pixel 10 Pro scores 15 points higher (73/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro leads (76/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro leads (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve leads (64/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10 Pro — 58/100, Tecno Pova Curve — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (76/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Google Pixel 10 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (64/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro (70/100 vs 49/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro: The Google Pixel 10 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Tecno Pova Curve: The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro Tecno Pova Curve
Processor Google Tensor G5 Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
AnTuTu 1467600 877641
Geekbench Single 2285 1011
Geekbench Multi 6191 2813
Display 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2856x1280 1080x2436
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4870 mAh 5500 mAh
Charging 29W 45W
Wireless charging 15W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 42 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3300 nits 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP64
Dimensions 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm
Weight 207 g 189 g
Launch price $999 $219
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
80
camera
Tecno Pova Curve
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
39
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro
  • 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2856x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro
  • 4870 mAh
  • Wired: 29W
  • Wireless: 15W
50
battery
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless charging: no data
64
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro and Tecno Pova Curve, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5
73/100
1467600 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova Curve Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
58/100 -67.2%
877641 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 10 Pro leads Tecno Pova Curve by 67.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 10 Pro
$999
Tecno Pova Curve
$219

Launch price difference: $780. Tecno Pova Curve was $780 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (76/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Google Pixel 10 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (80/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (64/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro (70/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova Curve — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro and the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro leads on camera score (80/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro leads on performance (76/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro over the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.