Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Tecno Pova Curve

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate; launch prices were $1099 and $219. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads — 74/100 vs 58/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5060); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is faster in AnTuTu (1,585,585 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 221g).

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova Curve — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Performance 74
Display 86
Camera 88
Battery 57
Portability 41
Value for money 60
Tecno Pova Curve
Performance 55
Display 89
Camera 39
Battery 64
Portability 70
Value for money 76
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1585585 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1900 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 5200 vs 2813

  • Higher performance (74/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (88/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Tecno Pova Curve better?
  • Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5060 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 37W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 221g
  • Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $1099

  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 86/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL scores 16 points higher (74/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (74/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — 60/100, Tecno Pova Curve — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (74/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (89/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (88/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (70/100 vs 41/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Tecno Pova Curve: The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Tecno Pova Curve
Processor Google Tensor G4 Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
AnTuTu 1585585 877641
Geekbench Single 1900 1011
Geekbench Multi 5200 2813
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1080x2436
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5060 mAh 5500 mAh
Charging 37W 45W
Wireless charging 23W
DXOMark (camera) 160
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 42 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 14 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP64
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm
Weight 221 g 189 g
Launch price $1099 $219
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera
Tecno Pova Curve
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
39
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
86
display
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
57
battery
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless charging: no data
64
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Tecno Pova Curve, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
74/100
1585585 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova Curve Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
58/100 -80.7%
877641 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads Tecno Pova Curve by 80.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
$1099
Tecno Pova Curve
$219

Launch price difference: $880. Tecno Pova Curve was $880 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (74/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (89/100 vs 86/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (88/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (70/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova Curve — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on performance (74/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.