Honor 60 SE vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor 60 SE (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 900, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 51/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 671,241); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor 60 SE doesn't; the Honor 60 SE is noticeably lighter (175g vs 309g).
Honor 60 SE
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Lighter: 175g vs 309g
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (77/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 671241
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1003
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2423
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4300 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 50/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 42/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Honor 60 SE vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 18 points higher (69/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 60 SE (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 60 SE is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 60 SE (63/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 60 SE significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (77/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Honor 60 SE | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 671241 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1003 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2423 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4300 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5.0, no Google Play Services | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×73.4×7.7 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Honor 60 SE
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Honor 60 SE
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 60 SE
- 4300 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Honor 60 SE and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor 60 SE by 77.1% in our overall performance rating.
Honor 60 SE
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 60 SE (91/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 60 SE is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 60 SE (63/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 60 SE significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (77/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Honor 60 SE or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Honor 60 SE — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 60 SE and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 60 SE has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 60 SE or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 42/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 60 SE or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Honor 60 SE over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 60 SE is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.