Honor Win vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor Win (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $599 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win leads — 78/100 vs 69/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor Win is faster in AnTuTu (3,991,174 vs 2,926,532); the Honor Win is noticeably lighter (229g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor Win better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3991174 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 15W
- Lighter: 229g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $2899
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 90/100)
- Longer battery life (95/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (30/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (52/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Honor Win scores 9 points higher (78/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win leads (95/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Honor Win — 70/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Win is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Win is a bit better (30/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3991174 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1272x2800 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Win
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Win leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 36.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2300. Honor Win was $2300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Win is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Win is a bit better (30/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Win edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Win and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Win has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Win leads on performance (98/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Win is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.