Honor Win RT vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor Win RT (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $384 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win RT leads — 75/100 vs 69/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win RT has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor Win RT is faster in AnTuTu (3,249,469 vs 2,926,532); the Honor Win RT is noticeably lighter (229g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win RT
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor Win RT better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3249469 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 229g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $384 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (38/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (52/100 vs 45/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win RT vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Honor Win RT scores 6 points higher (75/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT leads (80/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Honor Win RT — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (38/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win RT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3249469 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1272x2800 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×76.6×8.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $384 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win RT
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Win RT
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2800
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win RT
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win RT and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Win RT leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 11.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2515. Honor Win RT was $2515 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (38/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Win RT edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Win RT and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Win RT has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win RT over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Win RT is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.