Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400e, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $649 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 67/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,857,077); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 133).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 20 points (87/100 vs 67/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Performance 76
Display 79
Camera 67
Battery 46
Portability 51
Value for money 46
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 FE better?
  • Lighter: 213g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $649 vs $899

  • Better portability (51/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1857077
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1850
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 5500
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 20 points higher (87/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — 46/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400e Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1857077 3269794
Geekbench Single 1850 3228
Geekbench Multi 5500 9553
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 133 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 / One UI 6.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.0×77.3×8.0 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 213 g 226 g
Launch price $649 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
46
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e
67/100
1857077 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +43.2%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 43.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
$649
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $250. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE was $250 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (93/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (96/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (81/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 20 points (87/100 vs 67/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.