Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400e, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $649 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 88/100 vs 68/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,977,269).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 20 points (88/100 vs 68/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

Performance 77
Display 79
Camera 67
Battery 46
Portability 51
Value for money 50

Vivo iQOO 15

Performance 98
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 90

What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 FE better?

  • Lighter: 213g vs 215g

  • Better portability (51/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1977269
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1850
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5500
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $649

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 20 points higher (88/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — 50/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 90/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and the Vivo iQOO 15 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100).

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400e Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1977269 3950082
Geekbench Single 1850 3639
Geekbench Multi 5500 11047
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 133 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 / One UI 6.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.0×77.3×8.0 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 213 g 215 g
Launch price $649 $599

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera

Vivo iQOO 15

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
46
battery

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e
68/100
1977269 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +49.9%
3950082 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 49.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

$649

Vivo iQOO 15

$599

Launch price difference: $50. Vivo iQOO 15 was $50 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (98/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (85/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and the Vivo iQOO 15 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 20 points (88/100 vs 68/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (98/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.