Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400e, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $649 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 50/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,857,077).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 34 points (84/100 vs 50/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Performance 31
Display 100
Camera 67
Battery 33
Design 33
Value for money 65
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 97
Display 100
Camera 74
Battery 86
Design 16
Value for money 55
What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 FE better?
  • Lighter: 213g vs 227g
  • Cheaper: $649 vs $799

  • Better design/ergonomics (33/100 vs 16/100)
  • Better value for money (65/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1857077
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1850
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5500
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better camera (74/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (86/100 vs 33/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 34 points higher (84/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 33/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE leads (65/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (97/100 vs 31/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (74/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (86/100 vs 33/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (33/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400e Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1857077 4602290
Geekbench Single 1850 3640
Geekbench Multi 5500 11033
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 133
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 / One UI 6.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.0×77.3×8.0 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 213 g 227 g
Price $649 $799
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
33
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
86
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e
50/100
1857077 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +59.6%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 59.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
$649
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799

Price difference: $150. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is cheaper by $150.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (97/100 vs 31/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (74/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (86/100 vs 33/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (33/100 vs 16/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 34 points (84/100 vs 50/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (74/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 31/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.