Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A52s (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $449 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 55/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 781,542); the Samsung Galaxy A52s is noticeably lighter (189g vs 229g).
Samsung Galaxy A52s
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $889
- Better portability (70/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 781542
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1017
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 2943
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 40/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A52s vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 31 points higher (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A52s — 42/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (92/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (93/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (70/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A52s | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 781542 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1017 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2943 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $449 | $889 |
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A52s and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A52s by 74.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $440. Samsung Galaxy A52s was $440 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (92/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (93/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (78/100 vs 40/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (70/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s by 31 points (86/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A52s and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A52s over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.