Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A52s (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $449 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 55/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 781,542); the Samsung Galaxy A52s is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy A52s
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $950
- Better portability (70/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 781542
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1017
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2943
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 40/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A52s vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 36 points higher (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A52s — 42/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (85/100 vs 40/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A52s | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 781542 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1017 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2943 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $449 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A52s and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A52s by 81.6% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $501. Samsung Galaxy A52s was $501 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (99/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (96/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (85/100 vs 40/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A52s and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A52s over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.