Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy A52s (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $449 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 55/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 781,542); the Samsung Galaxy A52s is noticeably lighter (189g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy A52s
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 189g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $899
- Better portability (70/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 781542
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1017
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2943
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 40/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A52s vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 32 points higher (87/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A52s — 42/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (93/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A52s are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (81/100 vs 40/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A52s | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 781542 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1017 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2943 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $449 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A52s and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A52s by 76.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $450. Samsung Galaxy A52s was $450 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (93/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A52s are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (96/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (81/100 vs 40/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s by 32 points (87/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A52s and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A52s over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.