Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A52s (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $449 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 55/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 783,606); the Samsung Galaxy A52s is noticeably lighter (189g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A52s
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy A52s better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 225g
- Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $548
- Better camera (50/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 783606
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1017
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2943
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 54/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 40/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A52s vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 20 points higher (75/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s leads (50/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A52s — 34/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (95/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (50/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (80/100 vs 40/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (70/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A52s | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 783606 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1017 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2943 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $449 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A52s and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A52s by 78.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $99. Samsung Galaxy A52s was $99 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (95/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (99/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (50/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (80/100 vs 40/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (70/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s by 20 points (75/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A52s and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s leads on camera score (50/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A52s or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A52s over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.