Samsung Galaxy M36 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy M36 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 51/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 768,212); the Samsung Galaxy M36 is noticeably lighter (197g vs 229g).
Samsung Galaxy M36
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Lighter: 197g vs 229g
- Better portability (64/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 768212
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 2758
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M36 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 35 points higher (86/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M36 (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M36 (93/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M36 (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M36 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M36 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 768212 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1008 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2758 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.7 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | $889 |
Samsung Galaxy M36
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy M36
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M36
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy M36 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M36 by 75.2% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy M36
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M36 (92/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M36 (93/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M36 (78/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M36 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M36 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M36 by 35 points (86/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M36 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M36 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M36 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M36 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M36 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M36 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.