Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy A35 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1380, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $399 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 50/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 745,265).
Samsung Galaxy A35
Vivo iQOO 13
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $650
- Overall rating 50/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 745265
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2800
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 209g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A35 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 34 points higher (84/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A35 — 38/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (92/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (73/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy A35 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 745265 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 900 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2800 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.7×78.0×8.2 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $650 |
Samsung Galaxy A35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy A35 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy A35 by 76.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $251. Samsung Galaxy A35 was $251 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (92/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (78/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (73/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy A35 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 by 34 points (84/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.