Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 66/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4300); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 3,119,308); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 207g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Performance 94
Display 80
Camera 35
Battery 37
Portability 80
Value for money 44
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 3119308
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3271 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11051 vs 9494
  • Lighter: 180g vs 207g

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better portability (80/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper: $650 vs $1099

  • Better camera (78/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better value for money (80/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 18 points higher (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Vivo iQOO 13 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (73/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (80/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (80/100 vs 44/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Exynos 2600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3161830 3119308
Geekbench Single 3271 3041
Geekbench Multi 11051 9494
Display 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2520 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4300 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 180 g 207 g
Price $1099 $650
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
35
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
37
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Exynos 2600
66/100
3161830 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 -1.4%
3119308 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads Vivo iQOO 13 by 1.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
$1099
Vivo iQOO 13
$650

Price difference: $449. Vivo iQOO 13 is cheaper by $449.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Vivo iQOO 13 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (99/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (78/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (73/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (80/100 vs 55/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (80/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 35/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.