Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1999 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 75/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 3,065,623); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.0mm).

The Vivo iQOO 13 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

Vivo iQOO 13

Performance 91
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 82

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Better portability (66/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 3065623
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2910
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 9174
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 207g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $1999

  • Better camera (78/100 vs 76/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 9 points higher (84/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 91/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (78/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (73/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3065623 3150555
Geekbench Single 2910 3013
Geekbench Multi 9174 9287
Display 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2184x1968 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 145 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 215 g 207 g
Launch price $1999 $650

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Vivo iQOO 13

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100
3065623 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +2.7%
3150555 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 2.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Vivo iQOO 13

$650

Launch price difference: $1349. Vivo iQOO 13 was $1349 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 91/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (99/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (78/100 vs 76/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (73/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.