Vivo iQOO Neo 11 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $400 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 76/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6800); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,126,402).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo 11

Performance 91
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 92
Portability 49
Value for money 80

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 better?

  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 210g vs 224g
  • Cheaper at launch: $400 vs $892

  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (49/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3126402
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 11 points higher (87/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 80/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (98/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a bit better (49/100 vs 42/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 11: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3126402 3950082
Geekbench Single 3013 3639
Geekbench Multi 9287 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168 1200x2608
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7500 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 120W 90W
Wireless charging — 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
NFC — yes
Protection — IP68/IP69
Dimensions — 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 210 g 224 g
Launch price $400 $892

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo 11

  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless charging: no data
92
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3126402 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +20.9%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo iQOO Neo 11 by 20.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo 11

$400

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Launch price difference: $492. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 was $492 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (98/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (99/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (87/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a bit better (49/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 91/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.