Vivo iQOO Neo 11 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $400 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 88/100 vs 76/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 3,126,402).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 210g vs 219g
- Cheaper at launch: $400 vs $999
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (49/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 3126402
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 12 points higher (88/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 80/100, Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (98/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (49/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 3998145 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 159 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | $400 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.69
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless charging: no data
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 7500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Vivo iQOO Neo 11 by 21.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $599. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 was $599 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (98/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (87/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (49/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.