Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy A35 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1380, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $399 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 50/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 745,265); the Samsung Galaxy A35 is noticeably lighter (209g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy A35
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 209g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $899
- Better portability (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 745265
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2800
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A35 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 37 points higher (87/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A35 — 38/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (93/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 745265 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 900 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2800 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.7×78.0×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy A35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A35 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A35 by 77.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy A35 was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (93/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (81/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 by 37 points (87/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.