Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo iQOO 15T
The Samsung Galaxy A35 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1380, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $399 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 75/100 vs 31/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (3,815,522 vs 745,265).
Samsung Galaxy A35
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Lighter: 209g vs 216g
- Cheaper: $399 vs $499
- Better design/ergonomics (38/100 vs 30/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 75/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3815522 vs 745265
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2800
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (63/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A35 vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 44 points higher (75/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (82/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (63/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (74/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (82/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (63/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (74/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (38/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (82/100 vs 75/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo iQOO 15T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 745265 | 3815522 | |
| Geekbench Single | 900 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2800 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.7×78.0×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 209 g | 216 g | |
| Price | $399 | $499 |
Samsung Galaxy A35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy A35 and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15T leads Samsung Galaxy A35 by 80.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $100. Samsung Galaxy A35 is cheaper by $100.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (82/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (63/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (74/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (38/100 vs 30/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (82/100 vs 75/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 by 44 points (75/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (63/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (82/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 over the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.