Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo X Fold6
The Samsung Galaxy A35 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1380, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $399 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 50/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 739,266); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A35
Vivo X Fold6
What makes Samsung Galaxy A35 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $1900
- Overall rating 50/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 739266
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2800
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A35 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 38 points higher (88/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A35 — 28/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (95/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy A35 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (82/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (100/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 739266 | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | 900 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2800 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.7×78.0×8.2 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | — | |
| Launch price | $399 | $1900 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A35
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A35 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy A35 by 78.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1501. Samsung Galaxy A35 was $1501 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (95/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy A35 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (87/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (82/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (100/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 by 38 points (88/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.