Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1531 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 69/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 4400); the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 3,119,308).

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Performance 92
Display 78
Camera 52
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 42
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
  • Cheaper: $1531 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 69/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 3119308
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 52/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better value for money (80/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 19 points higher (88/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (80/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (87/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (82/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (100/100 vs 66/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (80/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Vivo X Fold6
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3119308 3485039
Geekbench Single 3041 3228
Geekbench Multi 9494 9553
Display 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1968x2184 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 25W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB
OS Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 215 g
Price $1531 $1900
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100
3119308 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +10.5%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 10.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
$1531
Vivo X Fold6
$1900

Price difference: $369. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is cheaper by $369.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (87/100 vs 52/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (82/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (100/100 vs 66/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (80/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 52/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.