Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $2199 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 78/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 3,453,998).

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 78
Camera 67
Battery 61
Portability 66
Value for money 64

Vivo X Fold6

Performance 95
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 84

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 95/100)

What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 3453998
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 60W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W
  • Cheaper at launch: $1900 vs $2199

  • Better camera (87/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 66/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 10 points higher (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 64/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (96/100 vs 95/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (87/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (82/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (100/100 vs 66/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Vivo X Fold6
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3453998 3455738
Geekbench Single 3639 3293
Geekbench Multi 11047 10243
Display 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1968x2184 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 60W 80W
Wireless charging 25W 50W
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 15
Brightness (peak) — 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions — 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 215 g —
Launch price $2199 $1900

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera

Vivo X Fold6

  • Main: 200MP f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo X Fold6

  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Vivo X Fold6

  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
78/100
3453998 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +0.1%
3455738 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra by 0.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

$2199

Vivo X Fold6

$1900

Launch price difference: $299. Vivo X Fold6 was $299 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (96/100 vs 95/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (87/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (82/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (100/100 vs 66/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 67/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.